ejabberd - Comments for "Flash 9 and ejabberd" https://www.ejabberd.im/node/1297 en You might want to see this https://www.ejabberd.im/node/1297#comment-2904 <p>Thank you, we will think about ajax/java.</p> Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:00:06 +0000 Tarick comment 2904 at https://www.ejabberd.im You might want to see this https://www.ejabberd.im/node/1297#comment-2888 <p>You might want to see <noindex><a href="http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jdev/2007-January/024902.html" rel="nofollow" >this reply in the Flash vs Jabber thread on jdev</a></noindex></p> <p>--<br /> sander</p> Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:35:37 +0000 sander comment 2888 at https://www.ejabberd.im Patch https://www.ejabberd.im/node/1297#comment-2884 <p>Have you any plans to modify your patch for 1.1.2 or latest svn version of ejabberd?</p> Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:06:05 +0000 Tarick comment 2884 at https://www.ejabberd.im No success https://www.ejabberd.im/node/1297#comment-2882 <p>It was unrelated, tkabber issued the same string, but connected succesfully. We were using XIFF AS3 with XMPPSocketConnection.<br /> Actually I'm asking on behalf of developer, being admin I can hardly explain methods in code that was used. However we sniffed traffic and discovered that ejabberd properly closes stream (&lt; / stream:stream &gt; ) right after its reply with authentification methods, as if client put some data after initial xmpp-request.<br /> So I wonder if it is fault of XIFF or just bad code we are using - therefore we need some working example.</p> Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:30:35 +0000 Tarick comment 2882 at https://www.ejabberd.im Tarick wrote: No success, https://www.ejabberd.im/node/1297#comment-2881 <div class="quote-msg"> <div class="quote-author"><em>Tarick</em> wrote:</div> <p>No success, we still saw long vertical string of bytes and error in connection.</p></div> <p>Would you mind sharing the complete error message? It might be comprehensible to some ☺</p> Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:19:51 +0000 legoscia comment 2881 at https://www.ejabberd.im