ejabberd - Comments for "WAN federation vs clustering configuration" https://www.ejabberd.im/node/24796 en Well, yes, but if you control https://www.ejabberd.im/node/24796#comment-65318 <p>Well, yes, but if you control the backend you could try to trick ejabberd to serve the same contact list, etc.</p> <p>It depends on what you want to do. For example, if this is mostly groupchat, it may not matter.</p> Fri, 06 Mar 2015 16:00:48 +0000 mremond comment 65318 at https://www.ejabberd.im thanks, it helps https://www.ejabberd.im/node/24796#comment-65317 <p>thanks, it helps indeed.<br /> about federation, if the two nodes in federation will have different domains, it means the user will have two JID, right? so it will appear as two different users when he is travelling or in office, and two rosters.<br /> it is not an ideal situation.</p> Fri, 06 Mar 2015 15:04:58 +0000 zagorskij comment 65317 at https://www.ejabberd.im Hello, Here are my https://www.ejabberd.im/node/24796#comment-65316 <p>Hello,</p> <p>Here are my comments:</p> <p>1. federation: Each ejabberd cluster / instance will have its own domain but you should be able to make it work like you want.</p> <p>2. clustering: Erlang clustering in ejabberd is not intended to work over WAN cluster. You need low latency connection and always on link between the nodes, so it will not work in your case.</p> <p>I hope this helps,</p> Fri, 06 Mar 2015 14:59:32 +0000 mremond comment 65316 at https://www.ejabberd.im