I'm seeing different

Brian Michalk — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:55:34 +0000

I'm seeing different behavior.

So, I just created a roster:
me@domain.com
user1
user2@domain.com

I'm running 2.0rc1, with Exodus client.
I'm only seeing user1 in my Exodus group.

On a second note:
I am new to instant messaging. This convention of requiring a JID (a username plus domain name); is this for real? It seems amazing to me that the full JID is required. This server is internal and private to a small group of about 100 people. We don't care about the JID, just the username. It would be nice to go with username only and throw out the JID.

I don't understand your problem

mfoss — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:35:32 +0000

I don't understand your problem. The ejabberd Guide says: 'Members: A list of full JIDs of group members, ...'. So, you must put full JIDs, not just the usernames.

Anyway, I tried your last example in ejabberd 2.0.0-rc1 and Erlang R11B-5: I see both user1 and user2@localhost in my 'localhost' server. But of course the JID 'user1' is not the same than 'user1@localhost'. So, I get the presence from user2@localhost, but not from user1@localhost.

ejabberd - Comments for "Shares Roster Groups and FQDN"

I'm seeing different

I don't understand your problem