ejabberd - Comments for "Ejabberd closing on stress tests without logs " https://www.ejabberd.im/forum/28637/ejabberd-closing-stress-tests-without-logs en Hi, can you give me https://www.ejabberd.im/forum/28637/ejabberd-closing-stress-tests-without-logs#comment-67273 <p>Hi, can you give me information about how to do the load test? are you using some tools or what?</p> Wed, 25 Jan 2017 05:29:52 +0000 stephen comment 67273 at https://www.ejabberd.im Thank you for responce. I https://www.ejabberd.im/forum/28637/ejabberd-closing-stress-tests-without-logs#comment-67245 <p>Thank you for responce.<br /> I tried increase fs.file-max = 1000000 to but still same issue.<br /> Updade:<br /> You are right, RAM is not enought<br /> 55513 users memory usage {total,1391764664}<br /> {system,971299032}</p> <p>Looks like 25kb need for 1 connection? (Only connection, without precense)</p> Fri, 30 Dec 2016 10:19:51 +0000 marinakr comment 67245 at https://www.ejabberd.im When I tested years ago, https://www.ejabberd.im/forum/28637/ejabberd-closing-stress-tests-without-logs#comment-67242 <p>When I tested years ago, there were two limits: one is the RAM, which you would notice as RAM usage would be high, it would start swapping and so consuming also CPU just to swap.</p> <p>The other limit was some soft limit. For example, you got a few more than 50.000 users; where each one may need two opened files, that would mean 100.000 file descriptors, which is what you have in fs.file-max. That's just an idea.</p> Wed, 28 Dec 2016 18:43:48 +0000 badlop comment 67242 at https://www.ejabberd.im