ejabberd - Comments for "Bind S2S to a specific IP address" https://www.ejabberd.im/node/511 en I think that s2s_in and https://www.ejabberd.im/node/511#comment-1095 <p>I think that s2s_in and s2s_out options are particular for every ejabberd node. So you can set them differently for every specific cluster node, right?</p> Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:21:34 +0000 mfoss comment 1095 at https://www.ejabberd.im Proposition to extend Bugzilla request https://www.ejabberd.im/node/511#comment-1094 <p>Maybe it would be also possible to extend the request to add possiblity to bind S2S_out to a specific cluster node (of course if specific IP address won't solve this).</p> Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:58:43 +0000 Tomaso comment 1094 at https://www.ejabberd.im It has been added to Bugzilla https://www.ejabberd.im/node/511#comment-1091 <p>It has been added to ejabberd's bugzilla:<br /> <noindex><a href="http://www.jabber.ru/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181" rel="nofollow" >Bug 181: Add option to bind S2S_out to a specific IP address</a></noindex></p> Tue, 22 Nov 2005 21:52:56 +0000 mfoss comment 1091 at https://www.ejabberd.im jabber.org and a SRV > CNAME > A redirection https://www.ejabberd.im/node/511#comment-1085 <p>&gt; Only problem, jabber.org *still* doesn't like me.</p> <p>The reason is that you have srv record for barnet.com.au pointing to a CNAME</p> <blockquote><p>;; QUESTION SECTION:<br /> ;jabber.barnet.com.au. IN A</p> <p>;; ANSWER SECTION:<br /> jabber.barnet.com.au. 2275 IN CNAME mag.barnet.com.au.</p></blockquote> <p>And there is a known bug (or also may be called a strict implementation of <noindex><a href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2782.txt" rel="nofollow" >RFC-2782</a></noindex>) in jabber.org's resolver — they just cannot resolve such double redirections X)</p> <p>Ref:</p> <p><noindex><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20040120174106/http://www.jabber.org/chatbot/logs/conference.jabber.org/jdev/2003-11-11.html" rel="nofollow" >http://www.jabber.org/chatbot/logs/conference.jabber.org/jdev/2003-11-11.html</a></noindex><br /> <noindex><a href="http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jadmin/2004-April/015326.html" rel="nofollow" >http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jadmin/2004-April/015326.html</a></noindex><br /> <noindex><a href="http://www.jabber.org/muc-logs/jdev@conference.jabber.org/2005-03-10.html" rel="nofollow" >http://www.jabber.org/muc-logs/jdev@conference.jabber.org/2005-03-10.html</a></noindex></p> Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:25:50 +0000 slipstream comment 1085 at https://www.ejabberd.im hard coding it is easy... https://www.ejabberd.im/node/511#comment-1084 <p>(21:34:19) mavetju: line 115 of ejabberd_s2s_out.erl, it creates the socket. Can I give the information from there?<br /> (21:35:33) badlop: i have this on line 142 (I'm using svn :P ):<br /> open_socket(init, StateData) -&gt;<br /> ...<br /> case catch gen_tcp:connect(ASCIIAddr, Port,[binary, {packet, 0}, {active, false}]) of<br /> (21:35:44) mavetjut: yes<br /> (21:35:55) mavetjut: asciiaddr is the destination<br /> (21:35:58) mavetjut: port is the destination.<br /> (21:36:03) badlop: yes, you can try to add the option to:<br /> [binary, {packet, 0}, {active, false}, {ip, ...}]</p> <p>I have added this, and now my outgoing TCP sessions are going happily via the IP address defined.</p> <p>Only problem, jabber.org *still* doesn't like me.</p> Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:01:37 +0000 MavEtJu comment 1084 at https://www.ejabberd.im