ejabberd - Comments for "Status of LDAPS support in ejabberd" https://www.ejabberd.im/node/719 en Re: Status of LDAPS support in ejabberd https://www.ejabberd.im/node/719#comment-1521 <div class="quote-msg"> <div class="quote-author"><em>fseesink</em> wrote:</div> <p>I figured it's quite likely that adding LDAPS support such that it just requires an adjustment of the configuration file might not be too far off.</p></div> <p>ejabberd includes a modified version of eldap on directory ejabberd/src/eldap/. That version seems architecturally improved (better fault-tolerance etc) but lacks at least one feature included on the original eldap: LDAPS support.</p> <div class="quote-msg"> <div class="quote-author"><em>fseesink</em> wrote:</div> <p>So are there currently any plans in the works for adding LDAPS support? And if not, where is the most appropriate place to log such a feature request? :-) </p></div> <p>No known plans on short term from known developers. Submit it to Bugzilla.</p> <p>After you submit the feature request, you can give this <noindex><a href="http://www.jabberes.org/files/badlop/ejabberd_ldaps_10minutes.diff" rel="nofollow" >10 minutes patch</a></noindex> a try if you have much, much spare time. I just looked at the original code and the modified one. I have no idea of LDAP/LDAPS but tried to port some code. It's such a quick, dirty and untested code that I give you a guarantee 99.9% that:</p> <ul> <li>this code will NOT work at all </li><li>maybe it connects using LDAPS, but will not send anything </li><li>it sends, but does not receive </li><li>it sends and receives, but does not close connections </li><li>it seems to work, but causes unstability </li></ul> <p>The patch is against SVN, and you need to change the options on eldap.erl lines 80..93 manually and recompile: use_tls=true, port=686, etc.</p> Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:37:49 +0000 mfoss comment 1521 at https://www.ejabberd.im